Eugene Civil Rights Lawyers Settle Dog Shooting Case - Arnold Law in Eugene, Oregon – Powerful Advocacy. Proven Results.

Eugene Civil Rights Lawyers Settle Dog Shooting Case

01.28.2011 – The Eugene civil rights lawyers of Arnold Law settled a lawsuit involving a coerced confession of a Creswell Oregon middle school boy. The case was filed in United States District Court (federal court) in Eugene under section 1983 (the federal civil rights enforcement statute) after Lane County and Creswell school employees talked a young boy into admitting that he shot and killed a dog with his pellet gun. He was sent through the juvenile delinquency process and humiliated in the community as a result.

Finally, through ballistic tests it was discovered that it was impossible for the student’s pellet gun to have killed the dog. The Lane County Juvenile Court case was dismissed and this Oregon federal civil rights litigation ensued.

It is common for children to be easily coerced into admitting to something they didn’t do just to please authority figures. In this case, the student was told that he could go back to class if he just admitted to shooting the dog (a dog was shot across the street from his house before a car drove off into the distance – the boy didn’t drive).

The most sickening part of the entire situation was when the deputy sheriffs paraded him out of the school to the child’s home without permission from the father. They then had the boy reenact a shooting that he did not even commit.

As a result of the lawsuit, both Lane County and the Oregon school district paid the boy damages to jump start his life post-high school. The parties also paid for all of his attorney fees. Only time will tell if this lawsuit had any effect on the government after their civil rights violations were uncovered by the law firm.

For more information about civil rights attorneys in Oregon, call Arnold Law at 541-338- 9111 or fill out the form to the left or live chat now to the right.

Awards/Recognitions
Interpreters Available
  • Representative Cases

    PERSONAL INJURY

    Product Liability – Zooma Scooter

    Lawsuit against stand-up gas-powered scooter after handle bar welding failed, causing crash with elbow fracture. Plaintiff received a poor offer and then a dismal arbitration award. Plaintiff appealed to a jury trial. Jury trial result 25 times the arbitration award. Sometimes it takes a jury to sort out a case.

    Product Liability/Wrongful Death – G-Max Motorcycle Helmet

    Husband and wife were on their motorcycle when negligent driver pulled out in front of them. Wife’s helmet strap webbing failed and her helmet came off. She died of head trauma. Six figure settlement with G-Max distributor.

    Nursing Home Death

    Complex litigation involving a for-profit nursing home where a CNA who failed to give anti-seizure medication to Vietnam War veteran several times. He died from seizure. Status: confidential settlement.

    Wrongful Death – Drunk Driver Kills Teenage Girl

    After a party in the hills, a drunk driver rolls his car off of an embankment, seriously injuring his passengers and killing our client’s teenage daughter. The car’s severely intoxicated owner and surviving passengers claim the decedent was driving. Our investigation uncovered a possible conspiracy between the kids to blame the girl who couldn’t speak for herself. The DA’s Office convicted the car owner for Furnishing Alcohol to a Minor but refused to have the blood in the car analyzed for DNA to establish who was driving. Arnold Law was able to seize the blood evidence, had DNA tests performed, and hired a passenger kinesiologist to determine the locations of the occupants based on blood location. The discovery of the car owner’s blood on the steering column led to a negotiated settlement between the injured occupants and the owner’s insurance company.