Lawyer Wins Controlled Substances DUII Trial in Medford, Oregon - Arnold Law in Eugene, Oregon – Powerful Advocacy. Proven Results.

Lawyer Wins Controlled Substances DUII Trial in Medford, Oregon

05.15.2014 – In a Medford (Jackson County) DUII trial, Arnold Law attorney Mike Arnold won a not guilty verdict.

In the Medford, Oregon, DUII trial, Mike represented a Jackson County resident who admitted to smoking Marijuana and taking prescription Vicodin.

medford-oregon-lawyer

The client was driving to work in the morning when she was stopped for failing to signal when changing lanes.

She admitted to smoking marijuana the night before and later admitted to taking Vicodin (hydrocodone), a prescription narcotic central nervous system depressant, that morning. She was asked to perform standardized field sobriety tests, which were video recorded. She was then arrested.

dui-marijuana-oregon

The Central Point Oregon police officer brought her back to the police station where she was asked to blow into an Intoxilyzer 8000 machine. Her blood alcohol content was 0.00%.

Thereafter, a Jackson County Oregon deputy sheriff was brought into the driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) investigation to perform a drug recognition evaluation (DRE). The DRE process is a scientifically invalid procedure much like Johnny Carson’s “Carnac the Magnificent” routine. The DRE is told the answer (that the suspect has admitted to consuming marijuana and Vicodin) and then the DRE says his tests indicate that the suspect is under the influence of what he was told the suspect consumed. It’s a silly process that Mike Arnold specializes in undermining with science and logic.

Later she was asked to give a urine sample, which ultimately tested positive for what she admitted to consuming. A blood test was not taken, which is the only way to show what is in someone’s blood.

After a critical cross-examination of the drug recognition evaluator and a persuasive closing argument, the jury returned a not guilty verdict.

As DUII attorney Mike Arnold was entering the elevator to leave, several jurors followed him and asked him for his card, saying that if they ever had any problems and needed an attorney that they would be sure to call. It is always nice to hear positive feedback from jurors who appreciated the process and respected the work done by the attorneys.

If you need a DUII attorney in Oregon, call Arnold Law at 541-338-9111, send us a message (left) or chat with us (right).

Awards/Recognitions
Interpreters Available
  • Representative Cases

    DUII (Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants)

    DUII - Eugene Railroad Tracks

    Client accused of driving on to railroad tracks when officer finds client exiting from the driver's side of a vehicle stuck on tracks 1/4 mile from the nearest road. Case dismissed after jury trial after discovery that law enforcement failed to investigate homeless witnesses who remember a woman driving a car through their bedroom at 3 a.m.

    DUII - Cottage Grove Railroad Tracks

    Client accused of turning down railroad tracks by mistake. Client claimed that the actual driver ran away from scene after getting stuck. Mistrial granted by judge then case dismissed after negotiations due to prosecutor failing to disclose a material witness who saw someone running from the direction of client's car a few blocks away from tracks..

    DUII - Refusal Due to Fear of Law Enforcement

    Client refused to blow after having one of friend's homebrew after work. Client's refusal of FSTs and intoxilyzer was due to lack of trust of law enforcement. Jury acquitted (found not guilty) after three hours of deliberations.

    DUII - Springfield Tavern Collision

    Client accused of driving his truck into the side of the bar causing damage and then fleeing scene. Law enforcement arrested him later at his home after he had some drinks at home. After a two-day Springfield Municipal Court jury trial, where cross-examination focused on the police officers' flawed investigation (by failing to investigate client's claims of drinking at home AFTER driving), and after less than thirty minutes of deliberation, the jury found him not guilty of DUII. Client did not testify.

    DUII - Car accident after Ducks game ends with dismissal

    Client was seriously injured and required a hip replacement after a driver ran a stop sign and collided with his car. Despite client not being at fault in the accident, a blood draw at the hospital purportedly showed that client had a greater-than .08% BAC and he was cited for DUII. Arnold Law conducted an investigation of the hospital blood draw procedures and obtained the user guide for the hospital's Beckman Coulter Chemistry Analyzer that was used for the blood test. We were prepared at trial to prove that Client's BAC was on its way up, that there was a delay in blood vial being tested that likely resulted in fermentation of the sample, and that the hospital blood test was not as accurate as a crime lab blood test which was not performed in this case. The case was dismissed two days before the jury trial.

    Diversion-eligible DUI dismissed

    Client accused of DUI after being stopped for entering a crosswalk while stopping at a red light. Client’s breathalyzer result was .05%, and he was still accused of DUII. Case dismissed after client rejected diversion and decided to proceed to trial with aggressive defense strategy and several witnesses willing to testify to his lack of intoxication on the night in question. Case resolved with a plea to a traffic violation and a fine.

    DUII/Hit and Run - Diversion on both counts

    Client accused of Driving while Intoxicated, crashing, and fleeing the scene. Case ended with a diversion on both counts, saving client’s employment and allowing client to have clean criminal record.

    DUII - Protecting professional licensing from state licensing board

    Professional client was accused of driving while intoxicated and crashing into a utility pole with .15% blood alcohol content. Client had prior DUII diversion. Case ended with client being able to keep professional license, dismissal of all citations, and minimum sanctions allowed by law.