Eugene Murder Defense Lawyer Settles Oregon Self-Defense Case - Arnold Law in Eugene, Oregon – Powerful Advocacy. Proven Results.

Eugene Murder Defense Lawyer Settles Oregon Self-Defense Case

05-22-2015 – A marine veteran and former UFC 44 mixed martial artist from Springfield, Oregon, had murder charges dropped in exchange for an accidental death conviction. Gerald Strebendt was charged in 2014 with one count of intentional murder. He hired Eugene criminal defense law firm Arnold Law to assist in the investigation pre-filing.

Strebendt shot and killed an intoxicated man who was on prescription anti-depressants in self-defense after a road rage incident. The Oregon murder defense law firm’s expert witnesses found proof in the black box that the aggressor used his vehicle as a weapon and intentionally rammed Strebent’s pickup truck after brake-checking Strebendt (nearly causing a collision).

Weeks after the self-defense shooting an anonymous and secret grand jury indicted Strebendt with one count of murder. The homicide criminal defense attorneys of Arnold Law worked nearly around the clock defending this innocent and falsely accused veteran.

Strebendt told a Register-Guard reporter that the reason he took the deal brokered by the Lane County District Attorney, his murder defense attorney, and a Lane County judge, was “basic math.”  He said the homicide plea deal bought him “insurance that I don’t have to run the risk of a jury getting it wrong.”

Plea Deals in Eugene Murder Cases

This is often the case for falsely accused defendants in Oregon who are over-charged due to poor investigations and unaccountable bureaucrats. They must make rational decisions based upon risk management rather than run the risk of a homicide or murder conviction. A judge would sentence a defendant after a homicide trial without any agreement by the prosecutors. This is a particular problem if a jury finds an “imperfect self-defense” and acquits on murder but convicts on Manslaughter or Criminally Negligent Homicide.

This murder criminal defense case saw a very politically charged process with the judge and district attorney alike all scrambling to hide from public scrutiny. There secrecy (gag orders, secret court pleadings, etc.) continued even after DNA evidence was uncovered that proved that there was a struggle over the AR-15 rifle prior to the fatal shooting. This was not disclosed publicly for many months.

[The AR-15 is America's most popular hunting & self-defense rifle. It can be damaged by moisture & politicians.]

[The AR-15 is America’s most popular hunting & self-defense rifle. It can be damaged by moisture & politicians.]

Hiring a Homicide Defense Lawyer for Murder or Manslaughter

For more information about defending murder and homicide cases in Oregon contact Arnold Law at 541-338-9111.

You can also read about a vehicular homicide acquittal in Linn County, Oregon by clicking here.  To read about a dismissal of a vehicular homicide in Klamath County, Oregon click here.

New Release - Buy Now

Arnold Law attorneys' new true crime book. Ebook for $6.99 or part 1 for FREE.

Awards/Recognitions
Interpreters Available
  • Representative Cases

    Sodomy I (Jessica’s Law) – 3 Measure 11 counts dismissed after innocence proved

    This was a Jessica’s Law case where, if convicted, Client was facing a mandatory minimum prison sentence of 25 to 75 years in prison. Client passed a polygraph in the case and his attorneys Mike Arnold and Lissa Casey conducted an investigation illustrating his actual innocence.

    Michael Arnold, stated, “Our client is thankful for his release and dismissal of these terrible false accusations against him. He was a wrongfully accused innocent man who had three months of his life stolen from him due to lies and an incomplete investigation. Arnold Law’s investigation showed a lack of motive and lack of opportunity to commit the acts alleged against him.The Government’s incomplete investigation turned what should have been an uncomfortable family matter involving a very troubled child into an unjustly incarcerated man and placed unthinkable stress on his family...”

    Sex Abuse Case dismissed

    Client charged with sexually abusing his employee. After an investigation showed that some of the complaining witnesses recanted their statements and motives for false accusations discovered, case dismissed before trial.

    Custody case motivates false Measure 11 accusations against father

    Client jailed with $1.68 million bail setting after being falsely accused of smothering his wife with a pillow and sexually assaulting two adoptive daughters, among other claims. The case eventually resolved with an Alford Plea to one count of coercion for allegedly forcing a remote control out of wife’s hands, which is expungeable at the end of probation, no additional jail time, and a dismissal of all remaining charges. After the dismissal, client was able to resume parenting time with his biological daughter and continue to be an active father.

    Attempted Sex Abuse I – Dismissed

    Client accused of having unwanted sexual contact with a woman while she slept in a hotel room. After thorough defense investigation of witnesses to incident were presented to the DA, all charges were dismissed before trial.

    CIVIL LITIGATION

    Sexual Harassment Defense – Hospital Administrator Stalking

    Mike Arnold defended the administrator of a hospital who pursued a relationship with a young woman who was apparently giving him mixed signals. Before contacting our firm he was convicted of a criminal stalking charge and lost a stalking order trial. She then sued him for $500,000 claiming sexual harassment, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. In a Marion County jury trial after a brutal cross-examination of the plaintiff and picking apart their psychologist expert, we won a defense verdict.

    STALKING ORDERS

    Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings – False Stalking Order to Gain Custody

    Received a $50,000 judgment through bankruptcy adversarial proceeding due to mother lying to get a stalking order.

    Stalking Order – Lying about Rape to Gain Custody

    We won a dismissal after trial. Court made findings of fact that stalking order was brought for an improper purpose.


    Testimonials

    Measure 11 Dismissal

    “I am not a resident of Oregon and was put in the awkward position of finding a competent attorney for my son who had just been charged with a very serious felony while attending a university here. My wife and I interviewed a number of the top attorneys throughout the state and also asked for advice from several attorney friends and a judge from our home state. None of the numerous attorneys we interviewed came close to the quality, knowledge and compassion of the Arnold Law Firm. They took care of my son and advised him in jail even before we had agreed to hire them. That really showed me the quality of this firm. I can not say enough good things about their firm. Everyone in the office is professional and personable.

    “My son was represented by Mike Arnold and Emilia Gardner. They are nothing short of incredible and almost like family. They left no stone unturned and worked relentlessly on his case. My son is now a free man and able to move forward with his life. Thank you all for everything you have done. You are the best!”