Oregon Felony DUII Attorneys in Eugene - Arnold Law in Eugene, Oregon – Powerful Advocacy. Proven Results.

Oregon Felony DUII Attorneys in Eugene

Oregon’s felony DUII law gives great penalties (90 days of jail) to Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants convictions for the third DUI conviction within 10 years. With a prior felony record or person-crime misdemeanor record, it could mean presumptive prison with the Oregon Department of Corrections.

[Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test]

[Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test]

For a first-time felony DUII, there are certain presumptive county jail sentences that were enacted by voters through Measure 73. That ballot measure also included mandatory sex offender prison sentences as well.

Felony DUIIs often involve long-term alcoholism. It is typically important to mitigate the sentencing issues in a case like this and treat the potential cause of the DUII by getting into in-patient alcohol recovery treatment immediately. Failing to do so could have consequences that involve a prison-induced timeout from alcohol.

When a prosecutor is offering prison, there is often nothing to lose by trying the case to a jury. Many of these trials involve a refusal of the breath test, errors in the highly technical drunk driving investigation, or factual defenses. It is important to hire a defense lawyer and legal team that tries DUIIs to a jury. The criminal defense attorneys of Arnold Law, led by award-winning DUII lawyer Mike Arnold, are first and foremost trial strategists. Call 541-338-9111 or live chat 24-7 for more information.

Interpreters Available
  • Representative Cases

    DUII (Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants)

    DUII - Eugene Railroad Tracks

    Client accused of driving on to railroad tracks when officer finds client exiting from the driver's side of a vehicle stuck on tracks 1/4 mile from the nearest road. Case dismissed after jury trial after discovery that law enforcement failed to investigate homeless witnesses who remember a woman driving a car through their bedroom at 3 a.m.

    DUII - Cottage Grove Railroad Tracks

    Client accused of turning down railroad tracks by mistake. Client claimed that the actual driver ran away from scene after getting stuck. Mistrial granted by judge then case dismissed after negotiations due to prosecutor failing to disclose a material witness who saw someone running from the direction of client's car a few blocks away from tracks..

    DUII - Refusal Due to Fear of Law Enforcement

    Client refused to blow after having one of friend's homebrew after work. Client's refusal of FSTs and intoxilyzer was due to lack of trust of law enforcement. Jury acquitted (found not guilty) after three hours of deliberations.

    DUII - Springfield Tavern Collision

    Client accused of driving his truck into the side of the bar causing damage and then fleeing scene. Law enforcement arrested him later at his home after he had some drinks at home. After a two-day Springfield Municipal Court jury trial, where cross-examination focused on the police officers' flawed investigation (by failing to investigate client's claims of drinking at home AFTER driving), and after less than thirty minutes of deliberation, the jury found him not guilty of DUII. Client did not testify.

    DUII - Car accident after Ducks game ends with dismissal

    Client was seriously injured and required a hip replacement after a driver ran a stop sign and collided with his car. Despite client not being at fault in the accident, a blood draw at the hospital purportedly showed that client had a greater-than .08% BAC and he was cited for DUII. Arnold Law conducted an investigation of the hospital blood draw procedures and obtained the user guide for the hospital's Beckman Coulter Chemistry Analyzer that was used for the blood test. We were prepared at trial to prove that Client's BAC was on its way up, that there was a delay in blood vial being tested that likely resulted in fermentation of the sample, and that the hospital blood test was not as accurate as a crime lab blood test which was not performed in this case. The case was dismissed two days before the jury trial.

    Diversion-eligible DUI dismissed

    Client accused of DUI after being stopped for entering a crosswalk while stopping at a red light. Client’s breathalyzer result was .05%, and he was still accused of DUII. Case dismissed after client rejected diversion and decided to proceed to trial with aggressive defense strategy and several witnesses willing to testify to his lack of intoxication on the night in question. Case resolved with a plea to a traffic violation and a fine.

    DUII/Hit and Run - Diversion on both counts

    Client accused of Driving while Intoxicated, crashing, and fleeing the scene. Case ended with a diversion on both counts, saving client’s employment and allowing client to have clean criminal record.

    DUII - Protecting professional licensing from state licensing board

    Professional client was accused of driving while intoxicated and crashing into a utility pole with .15% blood alcohol content. Client had prior DUII diversion. Case ended with client being able to keep professional license, dismissal of all citations, and minimum sanctions allowed by law.