Cottage Grove Municipal Court Attorneys in Oregon - Arnold Law in Eugene, Oregon – Powerful Advocacy. Proven Results.

Cottage Grove Municipal Court Attorneys in Oregon

Cottage Grove Municipal Court is south of Eugene off of Highway I-5 close to the southern edge of Lane County.The municipal court is run by a court administrator and the courtroom itself is run by Judge Martin Fisher of Eugene. He is a part-time judge who has a successful worker’s compensation practice in Eugene. He has recently revamped the court system down there to run more efficiently and fairly while still holding defendants accountable with respectful but firm justice. However, the Cottage Grove Jail is infamous for their TV dinners and inhospitable accommodations.

cottage-grove-municipal-court

The court in Cottage Grove, Oregon has a city prosecutor that administers offers through a mismatched court-appointed attorney system similar to other municipal courts. That makes hiring an experienced Eugene criminal defense attorney imperative.

If you are unjustly convicted in Cottage Grove Muni Court then you get a second bite at the apple. Since there is no court recording or reporting system down there, you have the right to appeal it directly to Lane County Circuit Court and start over, including a new trial.

This is an important fact for clients whose driver’s licenses are on the line with a potential Cottage Grove DUII conviction. The attorneys at Arnold Law try and win tough cases. Call 541-338-9111 or anytime 24/7 you can live chat with a representative.

Awards/Recognitions
Interpreters Available
  • Representative Cases

    DUII (Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants)

    DUII - Eugene Railroad Tracks

    Client accused of driving on to railroad tracks when officer finds client exiting from the driver's side of a vehicle stuck on tracks 1/4 mile from the nearest road. Case dismissed after jury trial after discovery that law enforcement failed to investigate homeless witnesses who remember a woman driving a car through their bedroom at 3 a.m.

    DUII - Cottage Grove Railroad Tracks

    Client accused of turning down railroad tracks by mistake. Client claimed that the actual driver ran away from scene after getting stuck. Mistrial granted by judge then case dismissed after negotiations due to prosecutor failing to disclose a material witness who saw someone running from the direction of client's car a few blocks away from tracks..

    DUII - Refusal Due to Fear of Law Enforcement

    Client refused to blow after having one of friend's homebrew after work. Client's refusal of FSTs and intoxilyzer was due to lack of trust of law enforcement. Jury acquitted (found not guilty) after three hours of deliberations.

    DUII - Springfield Tavern Collision

    Client accused of driving his truck into the side of the bar causing damage and then fleeing scene. Law enforcement arrested him later at his home after he had some drinks at home. After a two-day Springfield Municipal Court jury trial, where cross-examination focused on the police officers' flawed investigation (by failing to investigate client's claims of drinking at home AFTER driving), and after less than thirty minutes of deliberation, the jury found him not guilty of DUII. Client did not testify.

    DUII - Car accident after Ducks game ends with dismissal

    Client was seriously injured and required a hip replacement after a driver ran a stop sign and collided with his car. Despite client not being at fault in the accident, a blood draw at the hospital purportedly showed that client had a greater-than .08% BAC and he was cited for DUII. Arnold Law conducted an investigation of the hospital blood draw procedures and obtained the user guide for the hospital's Beckman Coulter Chemistry Analyzer that was used for the blood test. We were prepared at trial to prove that Client's BAC was on its way up, that there was a delay in blood vial being tested that likely resulted in fermentation of the sample, and that the hospital blood test was not as accurate as a crime lab blood test which was not performed in this case. The case was dismissed two days before the jury trial.

    Diversion-eligible DUI dismissed

    Client accused of DUI after being stopped for entering a crosswalk while stopping at a red light. Client’s breathalyzer result was .05%, and he was still accused of DUII. Case dismissed after client rejected diversion and decided to proceed to trial with aggressive defense strategy and several witnesses willing to testify to his lack of intoxication on the night in question. Case resolved with a plea to a traffic violation and a fine.

    DUII/Hit and Run - Diversion on both counts

    Client accused of Driving while Intoxicated, crashing, and fleeing the scene. Case ended with a diversion on both counts, saving client’s employment and allowing client to have clean criminal record.

    DUII - Protecting professional licensing from state licensing board

    Professional client was accused of driving while intoxicated and crashing into a utility pole with .15% blood alcohol content. Client had prior DUII diversion. Case ended with client being able to keep professional license, dismissal of all citations, and minimum sanctions allowed by law.